Complex agreements create a tailor-made procedure for virtually everything the Senate accepts, such as bills, joint resolutions, simultaneous resolutions, simple resolutions, amendments, appointments, contracts or conference reports. As two members of the Senate wrote today, in an era of increased individualism and bias, unanimous approval agreements tend to be cases of rupture, such as setting debate limits for a number of discrete changes, without limiting the number of amendments or setting a date or date for the final passage of the law. Nevertheless, today`s agreements are often broader, more complex and more complex than the compacts announced in the early 1900s. A wide range of precedents has even developed to regulate “how to interpret and apply unanimous approval agreements in different situations.” 21 In short, unanimous approval agreements are essential for dealing with the Senate`s workload and protecting the procedural rights of some senators. Until 1870, two scholars noted, unanimous approval agreements were “used with some frequency.” These early-unanimous approval agreements are “like today`s term limitation agreements that provide for the transfer of a measure to a specific date.” 5 An exchange, on 24 April 1879, illustrates the practical application of these agreements to limit debate and set the time for a vote. The exchange is a reminder of what is happening in today`s Senate. The fundamental objective of Rule XII was to clarify several uncertainties related to these Senate contracts. In the early 1900s, the Senate took modest steps to reduce some of the confusion associated with unanimous approval agreements, such as requiring that these agreements be tabled in writing in the office, read in the House and “printed on the front page of the business calendar as long as they are effective.” However, more changes were to come. Two overlapping factors explain why the Senate has agreed to a formal rule change to frame these agreements.
First, there have been some ambiguities related to these agreements, which continue to cause quarrels and confusion. Previous precedents have simply not adequately addressed these recurring problems. Second, a captivating event – a senator was taken by surprise when a unanimous approval agreement was reached – highlighted the need for a formal rule (Rule XII) to resolve issues related to these gentlemen`s agreements. In non-legislative advisory bodies acting under Robert`s Regulation, unanimous approval is often used to expedite the review of non-controversial applications.    Sometimes it is used as a time-saving device, especially at the end of the session. Sometimes Members do not want a formal vote on this issue or they know that they would lose such a vote and do not feel the need to take the time to do so. If an item is before the Assembly to act, z.B a dissolution, it is the right of each member to have it read once.  Another case of this requirement is the reading of the minutes.
Unanimous approval is required not to be read. Any member can demand that the minutes be read and it should be done.  In announcing the implementation of these agreements, the presiding officers took different positions. A presiding official said: “It was the president`s universal decision that the president cannot get a unanimous approval agreement, but that he must be in the honour of the senators themselves. 13 On another occasion, the Speaker of the Senate asked, “Is it the joy of the Senate to enforce or not the unanimous agreements?” Senator John Sherman, R-OH, responded that the President should “enforce the agreement on this bill.” The Speaker then asked, “In similar cases, what is the joy of the Senate?” Senator Eugene Hale, R-ME, replied, “We will cross this bridge when we get there.” 14 Cons: “Vice-Presidents Charles Fairbanks and James Sherman were not